The FCC can improvr the current API's first by providing a full discription of what the acronym API stands for. Along with the explanation of what API's are and what they are used for and why would they be necessary in relations to handheld device owners when using their devices?.
I really dont get this,it look more like. The united states that claimed to be united was never united at all people sitting in the cut waiting for someone to crocke just to get there greedy plams on what they assumed would belong them but some how they would have to come up with a way to fool the sheeple into thinkiing they are the real shepard of the flock. This maybe a bit unruly, however,npthing is comparing to what is bei.g done to our communication
I just can not understand how first of all the cable or isp think they can decide what or who should be delivering communcation into our homes.any way. If i am not mistaken is it not for the sake of competition and innovation that is suppose to created more chooses for customers,or was it the patriot act that caused everyone.to give up their wirelines because of nationl security,or because telecos were in bed with data brokers that people are being forced to submit to common carriers or cable giants of our communication system,
We should choose wisely look its all been laid out every t crossed ever i is dotted,yet a choose to erase is evident, moble broadband is telecommunications which is title two common carrier,a connection to the internet is telecommunaction,once you gain access you are no longer under common carrier because your connected to servers that already contain Big Data enough to handle just about every request they receives,so if the what to draw a line it at the point of connection that is the main frame for internet openess and freedom,
There ae issue going on and it could appear as if no one is really paying attention so people are behaving as if it were true
Maybe they could just close the back door so it wont be such a draft coming in. And by yhe way whats going on with our BTOP program,maybe
The Fcc should have no problem with this one just hope we're dont need to call rocket sciencentis in for this,everything going on in the industry is under Telecommunications so why would they think any different
The standard should be set for all communications wi fi cable or isp,if the wi fi spectrum is unlicensed it should not be included in their advertisiment of services and ask for payment to be included in data plans
With the big major company making changes,isp constantly manipulating the networks,interfering,with the end users connections,and ability to access and recive vital information through the internet. Some attention needs to be payed to the fact that end users will not have to be dependent upon neither cable or isps for a connection,its all about the devices that one chooses to use that will determine hpw the will connect. They are already able tp communicate with each other in order to function properly.so if the cable,isp industy continue to male chooses
The fact that they are already trying to hog up the unlicensed spectrum that is meant for the use of which ever device one chooses to connect,without interference,or limit,
This is just how it should be its sound and reasonable, countinuing to favor big biz then thats not a level playing field and is causing hardship and harm customers as well as consumer.
It would not be fair to say people are hogging up cell towers why those payments roll in do ypu really think they are thinking about cell towers. I think not. Thats why they went with competion and innovation but instead of more cell tower they choose digital which put cell tower at the lower frequin e
Just curious why Im just reading this post from 2012 in 2014,guess I havent been paying attention
This is the the way its intended all thing have a pe ak and the a decline so its not as if anything has really changed. Just different why of doing it.