1 voteB shared this idea ·
8 votesB commented
I sorta of agree to this, On one end it's hard to do because there are a lot of factors that can impact your speeds. And it would be impossible to market to every individual with the exact speeds that they can provide.
That being said, i think they should only be allowed to market the worst case scenario speeds. Or at minimum be required to guarantee a worst speed.
Really thou, does it matter? what are you going to do we NEED internet. That's the whole point of this site.They have us by the ***** ... we cant afford not to sign these contracts agreeing to stuff that is in no way in our interest and are just out there to price allow companies to provide the lowest standard of service.
I think that they should require ISPS to not have 24 month contracts. This way if their service sucks the market can force out ISPS that don't deserve to be servicing the communities.
Government should own the infrastructure and lease it out to companies.... they have let companies get to deep in that the government has no choice but to let them set the rules.
If the Government is allowed to take land from taxpayers for public use should they not also be allowed to go in and take over these buildings from poor ISPS?