479 votesstarted · 82 comments · CLOSED: A New FCC.gov - Feedback » Website Feedback & Discussion · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
i REALLY HOPE OBUMMER SEE,READS AND HEEDS THE COMMENTS.TJEN GETS RID OR IT.
tHE GOVERNMENT WILL TELL US HOW POPULAR AND WELL LIKED IT WAS..AND WHAT A GOOD IDEA TO DO THIS....,A LIE THEY WILL NEVER ASK "KEEP IT OR TRASH IT" .THIS WAS ANOTHER GOVERNMENT "PLAYPRETTY".
Myself ,I think it was a WASTE of time,monies,energies that could have been put to a better use elsewhere.
It should be trashed,forgotton never thrust upon us again.
STYLE OVER SUBSTANCE should be the title.Just tells how wonderful the chairman is. IT IS A NOTHING SITE..
New FCC website SHOULD be trashed and go back to the former one.
STYLE OVER SUBSTANCE is a very good way to describe the new FCC website, I will usethe former version as long as I can.The new one just tells how wonderfull theNEWT supported this idea ·
HARD TO USE ,HARD TO FOLLOW ,BUT i KNOW ,SOMEONES BRO-IN-LAW NEEDED A JOB , OR SOMEONE GOT A KICK-BACK FOR O.K.ING THIS VERSION. .NO ONE LIKES IT BUT THE GOVT. WILL STAND BEHIND IT AND SAY WE ALL LOVED IT..HATE IT......
TIM SAWYER WAS CORRECT , READ HIS POST ONCE MORE.The FCC has and continues to be driven by a PR-firm make over, spending untold amounts of tax-dollars on promoting its own agenda. The new makeover of the site overlooked what we as users of the site cared about access to data and tools. The new site is PR driven to promote the Chairman's agenda. A government agency that has a PR firm - unbelievable.
Style over substance is correct..Go bav to the previous version, but that might mean someones friend,relative ,whatever might be told they did a rotten job...Just "another pretty face in the crowd. " NEW VERSION SUX..GO BACK..