i waste more man hours per day answering automated calls. sometimes i even receive more calls from automated recordings than customers. this waste alone has cost the business money, and right now money is hard to come by.

Too many in our country are consumed with their own rights rather than what will benefit the greater good. Children should not be exposed to nudity or profanity and this consideration should dictate FCC's policies. If this was not monitored, even commercials and "family" shows would run amok with nudity and profanity and (good) parents would not be able to have the tv or radio on at all. It seems to be a fading notion to protect those who are vulnerable but there is a cost to such selfishness. Have the courage to stand up for what is right people!

Would the people of the city of Fairbanks not be better served if one person did not have a monopoly on local TV news coverage? When did the FCC start granting such monopolies?

Consumers with a life line credit are of low or no income. Some states have acknowledged the unfair practices, of providing communications to elderly and disable individuals and have them exempted from the "Federal Subscriber Line Charge". In public rule making, perhaps the FCC should have some feedback on a state level, as to whom will 'benefit' when allowing such charges and whom will the impact hinder. As my life line credit has helped in the passed, but it is has shrunk in it's intended purpose with the approval of ALL the other charges for a standard land line service.

We recently had to wait for more than 55 minutes for a live operator to help us with a port of wireless number from AT&T to Straighttalk (Tracfone Wireless). The question I have is if FCC should require service level agreements for these companies who are grabbing consumers without having the infrstructure and customer support capacity to service them?!

you never make the junk fax companies pay nal? why

Physical threats to an individual should not be tolerated even if its on Yahoo. I also believe that people would think twice of what they are posting if they were required to post their real picture/ live camera screen when posting.

FCC site has no transparency, no dates on search items, set up to be opaque to public so it can serve the communications industry's sandbox -- or so it appears. New cross-ownership rule is a major change that should be featured on front page of FCC website.

NO MORE MEDIA CONSOLIDATION!

Allow people to opt out of expensive stations like ESPN in order to reduce their cable bill.

It should not be such a complex procedure to be allowed to broadcast FM radio. I would say that the current policy is unjust. Read more and sign the petition at https://www.change.org/petitions/fcc-stop-requiring-a-license-to-operate-fm-radio-stations . Thank you.

It seems that too many people believe that they are helplessly subjected to the companies that are regulated by the FCC. Most people don't even know that the FCC exists or that they can file a complaint. If more people would speak up about their experience and start complaining I think patterns would become visible very soon and hopefully result in policy making that is much more to the point of the issues.

Americans pay more for the worst telecommunication services than anyone else in the developed world. End large monopolies like Verizon, AT&T, and Comcast by letting smaller companies have greater access to lower spectrum frequencies, unlock all cell phones, eliminate erroneous fees, fine them for poor customer service, and make a bigger effort to notify the public of pending actions through social media. Americans don't get value for the overpriced services they recieve.

It has been two years and there is still no word on this. It seems to have quietly been set aside with no ruling and no explanation. According to the FCC Encyclopedia, the proposal to license GMRS “by rule” instead of the current individual licensing requirement is still pending. This leaves current and future licensees of the GMRS in limbo. If the commission is going to procrastinate or decline to address it, at least inform the public as to why. Such inaction does not serve the public.