New site emphasizes style over substance
The new site looks very pretty, but unfortunately it appears to have been designed by graphic designers and not by anyone who actually uses the FCC's site.
Someone who actually participates in FCC proceedings wants to know what the most recent actions are that have been taken by the Commission and its Bureaus. This person also wants to know about meetings, workshops, and changes to comment deadlines. This person also wants to be able to quickly access the relevant detailed information from each bureau.
All of this important information is buried or truncated to the point of being unusable under the new site design.
Under the original site, the front page contains the complete name of each news release along with prominent links to the full version of the document in Word or PDF format. Under the new version you get a severely truncated version of the title that may not even give you the most important information (e.g., "Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Accounces Division Name..." Name what??). At least when you click on the "More from the newsroom" link you get a list with the complete names, but this information should be on the front page. Furthermore, when you do get to that page, you have to click again on the name to get to a third page that gives an unofficial HTML text version of the document with links to the official versions in PDF/Word/etc. Why are these links to the documents not prominently featured on the front page? It might be less attractive, but at least the important information is available with one click as opposed to three.
Navigating the Bureau pages are even more ridiculous. On the old (or "grown up") version of the FCC homepage, you could access the Bureaus with one click from the menu on the right, then you were taken to a page that prominently listed all the recent actions taken by the Bureau, with direct links to the documents.
Now, there is a drop down at the top that will take you to a "Bureaus and Offices" homepage. From there you can click on the Bureau you want. At the new Bureau homepage, you are greeted by an "Inside the Bureau" list of somebody's opinion of what are the most important current activities. Below that you finally get to something usable, misleadingly named "Related Information." Here we have the headlines, but these also suffer from unfortunate truncation. (e.g., "Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Announces Deadlines For Comments...") Again, this is completely unhelpful and hides the most important information from the user.
This is only a quick assessment. I'm sure that a more complete review of the websit would reveal many other places where form was so far elevated above function as to produce absurd results. Please keep in mind that people come to the FCC's site to access information about specific, often highly technical, regulatory proceedings. The overwhelming majority of the site's users will be much more interested in getting complete headlines and instant access to Bureau documents than they will be in seeing videos of bureau chiefs talking about their jobs.
78 comments
-
Anonymous
commented
I am looking for the status on tkt #Cims00003625024 Other than CBS I am only getting spanish tv. All other signals are being blocked in Bklyn, NY Please adise status
-
Anonymous
commented
What happened to Bureau personnel and organizational listings (e.g., the Enforcement Bureau) and a Commission telephone directory?????
-
NEWT
commented
i REALLY HOPE OBUMMER SEE,READS AND HEEDS THE COMMENTS.TJEN GETS RID OR IT.
-
NEWT
commented
tHE GOVERNMENT WILL TELL US HOW POPULAR AND WELL LIKED IT WAS..AND WHAT A GOOD IDEA TO DO THIS....,A LIE THEY WILL NEVER ASK "KEEP IT OR TRASH IT" .THIS WAS ANOTHER GOVERNMENT "PLAYPRETTY".
-
NEWT
commented
Myself ,I think it was a WASTE of time,monies,energies that could have been put to a better use elsewhere.
It should be trashed,forgotton never thrust upon us again.
STYLE OVER SUBSTANCE should be the title.Just tells how wonderful the chairman is. IT IS A NOTHING SITE.. -
NEWT
commented
New FCC website SHOULD be trashed and go back to the former one.
STYLE OVER SUBSTANCE is a very good way to describe the new FCC website, I will usethe former version as long as I can.The new one just tells how wonderfull the
-
Susan
commented
The new site is terrible. On a par with the Puerto Rico Junta Reglamentadora site. Nice looking, I guess, but totally useless. With the old site it took determination but you could in fact find things on there. The new site makes it exponentially ****** to find anything you might be looking for. Even months after the roll out. Still terrible.
-
Susan
commented
I agree with all comments of others who hate the redesign. Months after the roll out, It's still terrible. Reminds me of the Puerto Rico Telecom Regulatory Board (JRT) site. nice looking but totally useless.
-
Telecom Attorney
commented
It's kind of ironic that links to the Bureaus and Offices were already very accessible on the "old FCC" homepage. So the improvement is to give us back links to the bureaus, but then force us to first stop at a PR page about each Bureau before we can find the information we need. This continuing emphasis on self-promotion for the FCC, at the expense of providing users access to the information and tools they need to interact with it, is really counterproductive to the FCC's mission. Please, can someone be put in charge of this project who understands what the FCC does and how people transact businss with it?
-
Deborah D. McAdams
commented
Wow. You guys are hilarious.
-
Hi. Thank you for all of your feedback. We've continued to work on improving FCC.gov and one recent addition is that the Bureaus and Offices of the agency are linked in the navigation bar of each page, under 'The FCC'. -FCC New Media.
-
Content Strategist
commented
Check the tabs at the top of the Comments view, Anon. The default used to be "Top," where this one is, indeed, first. Now, the default is "New," so you see the latest comments first.
-
Anon
commented
Interesting how this posting no longer shows up first when you click on the comment page. You now have to search for this top posting. Guess the FCC was not interested in having people see or comment on this anymore.
-
Anonymous
commented
Agree - Finding information is lost. A lot of glitz, but no substance
-
Anonymous
commented
Agree - Hate the new WEB site
-
a radio amateur
commented
I hope President Obama sees these comments!
-
a radio amateur
commented
I hope President Obama sees these comments!
-
Pepe LePew
commented
The only way to improve this site is to bring back the old one. This new web site is just awful. It's too hard to find anything, even a simple search for a broadcast station. What a waste of taxpayer money.
-
Telecom Attorney
commented
The press is reporting today that the FCC has determined that less than 10% of the visitors to the FCC's website are practitioners. Putting aside how the FCC determined who uses the site and for what purpose (raising some interesting privacy issues), this observation further proves that the new website is being developed primarily as a PR tool with only secondary consideration to the entities that are regulated by the FCC and persons representing such entities. By viewing regulated entities and practitioners as secondary users of the site, the agency overlooks the greater public interest (and ultimate benefit to consumers) in making it efficient for these "minority" of users to efficiently access the site. However, the FCC obviously has a greater interest in promoting itself to the 90% of visitors believed to be consumers (aka voters). Ironically, bandwidth intensive videos of how the FCC is expanding the availability of broadband will not reach consumers who do not have broadband today or who simply choose not to subscribe.
Maybe the agency could implement its own form of the Fairness Doctrine by posting videos from practitioners or industry representatives explaining how the agency is falling short in its mission, starting with its wasteful expenditure of resources on this so-called new media website.
-
JG
commented
I agree 100 percent with all of this comment. As a telecom attorney that uses the FCC's website almost daily, I find the new website completely unworkable. The old version was very straightforward and easy to navigate; now all of the substantive information I rely on to do my job everyday is buried deep inside the website and is almost impossible to find. Like other commenters, luckily I have most of the important pages I use everyday bookmarked. Sadly, I'm sure the goverment poured millions of dollars into redesigning the website to incorporate useless, gimicky "social media" tools. Clearly this is an FCC #fail.